Today, Lent Madness offers us a tough choice between Juan Diego and Frederick Douglass. Their respective stories and legacies are compelling yet only one will advance to the Elate Eight. To paraphrase a best-selling book: Eat, Pray, Vote. Unless you've already eaten. In which case, just pray and vote.
Yesterday, in a hotly contested battle, Molly Brant edged out Cuthbert 51% to 49% and will advance to face the winner of Bernard Mizecki vs. Jackson Kemper.
Oh, and don't forget to watch yet another exciting episode of Monday Madness. Tim and Scott mention a few folks (at least by town) who have been cast into the outer darkness for voting too many times from a single location and they reveal just who writes all the Monday Madness scripts (HINT: It's not Jimmy Fallon's talented stable of writers).
Juan Diego, raised according to the Aztec pagan religion, showed an unusual and mystical sense of life even prior to hearing the Gospel from missionaries. It is said that before the famous apparition of the Virgin Mary, Juan Diego was a virtuous man who led such an exemplary life that people often asked him to intercede for them in prayer.
On December 9, 1531, Juan Diego experienced that apparition in which he asked the Virgin her name. She responded in his native language of Nahuatl, "Tlecuatlecupe," which means "the one who crushes the head of the serpent" (side note: the serpent was a very important symbol in Aztec religion! Coincidence?!?) "Tlecuatlecupe" when correctly pronounced, sounds very similar to "Guadalupe."
Thus, the Americas would have a new symbol of hope in La Virgen de Guadalupe.
Having carried out La Virgencita’s message (another popular name used for the Virgin of Guadalupe), Juan Diego lived out his life in a hut next to the church built in her honor. There he spent his days in prayer, extending hospitality to pilgrims visiting La Virgencita.
It is very possible that Juan Diego never fully understood the impact that his willingness to be a messenger had for his people. Because of Juan Diego, the Indigenous people of Mexico heard the clear message that they too were beloved children of God. The choice of a simple indigenous man as a messenger for the Virgin of Guadalupe meant that all people were important. Juan Diego’s witness to the appearance of La Virgen changed the face of the Church, opening the doors to all people regardless of nationality or social standing.
In his canonization homily, Pope John Paul II said, “In accepting the Christian message without forgoing his indigenous identity, Juan Diego discovered the profound truth of the new humanity, in which all are called to be children of God. Thus he facilitated the fruit meeting of two worlds and became the catalyst for the new Mexican identity, closely united to Our Lady of Guadalupe, whose mestizo face expresses her spiritual motherhood which embraces all Mexicans."
La Virgen de Guadalupe, is a powerful symbol that reminds the poorest of the poor, that they are loved and important in the eyes of God. This was an important message in a time when the conquistadores had convinced everyone that the Indigenous in the Americas were less than human.
How marvelous that Juan Diego a “nobody” in the eyes of the Aztec Empire and in the eyes of the conquistadores would be chosen to carry out such an important message and serve as a role model to all Christians!
NOTE: Juan Diego’s tilma with the imprinted image of La Virgen hangs in the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe. According to a study by Virgilio Elizondo, professor of Pastoral and Hispanic Theology at the University of Notre Dame, there have been many reports suggesting that the tilma is fake, possibly brought from Europe. Elizondo argues that if the tilma had been manufactured in Europe it would had not have lasted as long as it has. The tilma seems to be made from woven hemp, from a plant that is native to Mexico, explaining the tilma’s remarkable state of preservation.
Throughout Frederick Douglass’ life, literature and Holy Scripture remained an ever-present force. After his escape from slavery, Douglass, who was born Frederick Augustus Washington Bailey, renamed himself after a character in Walter Scott’s The Lady of the Lake. His sense of mission was inspired by the prophetic words of Old Testament Scripture.
Regarding the Civil War, Douglass wrote, “Civil war was not a mere strife for territory and dominion, but a contest of civilization against barbarism.” After the Civil War, Douglass brought attention to the rise of lynchings in the Deep South and the ongoing racism that prevented the economic and social advancement of African Americans. He was also an outspoken advocate for female suffrage. Hours before his death Douglass stood alongside suffragist Susan B. Anthony and Methodist minister and physician Anna Howard Shaw as they rallied for women’s voting rights. Regarding the matter, Douglass once wrote in his newspaper The North Star, “Right is of no Sex — Truth is of no Color. God is the Father of us all, and we are all Brethren.”
Although Douglass spent much of his time traveling and giving speeches, he and his family called Washington D.C.’s Anacostia neighborhood home. It was there that he purchased 15 acres of land and built his 20-room home, which he called Cedar Hill. Although Douglass’ home offered a clear view of the U.S. Capitol building, he often retreated to a cabin behind his house, which he named “The Growlery.” There, Douglass, read, wrote, and “growled” when the mood called for it. Charles Dickens’ novel, The Bleak House, served as Douglass’ inspiration for his Growlery. Douglass’ dog, a mastiff, often kept him company when Douglass took to his cabin. Douglass also took great pleasure exercising with barbells.
Douglass’ eventual financial and relative vocational success was a far cry from his birth in the confines of slavery and reflects his dogged determination, his belief in the dignity of humankind — which he noted was rooted in his study of Holy Scripture — and his unwillingness to let evil win. That said, Douglass was not content to rest on his successes knowing that many African Americans with equal determination and faith faced unyielding resistance and violence. And in the face of strident criticism and danger, Douglass remained resolute: “I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false, and to incur my own abhorrence.”
On June 19, 2013, a seven-foot statue of Douglass was unveiled in the U.S. Capitol building. The date of the statue’s dedication, known as Juneteenth, commemorates the arrival of the Emancipation Proclamation to the people of Texas.
Vote!
[poll id="128"]
142 comments on “Juan Diego vs. Frederick Douglass”
¡Que viva la Virgen de Guadalupe! ¡Que viva Juan Diego!
A simple, humble, illiterate man like Juan Diego would leave no writings or quotes that we could analyse, or could be found on the Web or Wikipedia. From the other comments, we also seem to be stuck on our own view of the United States as "America" and ignore the rest of America. Juan Diego's response to the "Lady" has had huge effect on millions of people through the centuries in the rest of America and here as well. For the advancement of the Gospel on a continental scale and the saving of indigenous people from genocide by the conquistadors, I vote for Juan Diego.
I was hard pressed to decide and re-read the bios. Then, this being the round for quirks and quotes, I chose the quirky rose-filled tilma and the faithful gentleman who faithfully carried its message to the world.
Juan Diego never existed. The Franciscans, who had custody of the shrine when it first opened, knew the painting was done by an Aztec Christian artist names Marcos Cipac de Aquino and said so. The then Dominican Archbishop of Mexico, who supported devotion to the painting, removed the Franciscans from custody of the shrine and replaced them with more pliable members of his own order. Juan Diego is a pious fraud concocted by Dominican missionaries to further their evangelistic efforts. Frederick Douglas, on the other hand, actually existed and accomplished great good in his lifetime work of liberating slaves and uplifting newly freed people. Reality over pious fraud any day.
"Fraud" is a little harsh, don't you think? Juan Diego may or may not have existed ~ that's not relevant to LM. What you state as fact is not necessarily so, not about the painting to which you refer nor to Juan Diego ~ it may or may not be factually true. It is one story and even if factually true may not be Truth. I respect your vote for Douglass, but you don't have to denigrate a pious man, or a pious myth, or an image that has moved millions of faithful people simply to justify your vote.
Donald, I think you might want to do a little more research, before you make such statements. While I am a Lutheran, I have several degrees from Catholic schools, so I have had a chance to learn a thing or two about Roman Catholicism. First, before canonization, a "Saint" goes through a rigorous review, and there is a beatification BEFORE canonization. During all the period there are people who research the proposed "Saint." Juan Diego has been through that rigorous review! Second, certain things are known about Juan Diego that are not the kind of thing that would be made up. Dates of birth and death and his original Aztec name, etc. You might want to do some more reading on the subject, such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica article on Juan Diego http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/162607/Saint-Juan-Diego
Again the Encyclopaedia Britannica has a very rigorous staff of writers and editors, they do not just publish any old article, it has been thoroughly researched beforehand! While I voted for Frederick Douglass, I think you are very wrong in saying that Juan Diego was not real and was fraudulent!
Ok Sec these are getting too tough. It's giving me a migraine just to choose.
While I do not think the AME Church has sainted anyone, Frederick Douglass got my vote today as an Elate 8 saint. I think the story about Juan and his life is amazing and he is truly a virtuous saint who was obviously selected by the Virgin Mary for his incredible piety. But, Douglass endured so much cruelty and pain, yet then stood bravely for so many once free in a time of our nation's history where it took great faith and bravery to do so. Go Saint Frederick Douglass! I see him in the Faithful 4 as well.
To honor La Virgen de Guadalupe and her ever present presence in south Texas. ¡Viva Juan Diego!
After some thought, I voted for Frederick Douglass.
This is just TOO hard! I love the FD quote. But my sister-in-law is from Mexico and I have been to the Basilica. Juan Diego today but no disrespect to Frederick!
This one was really tough. But being hispanic I am so grateful to Juan Diego for giving the Americas its Patron Saint in La Virgen de Guadalupe.
SOOOO hard to vote against either one!! LOVE both of them!! ARGH!!
CanNOT vote against Frederick Douglass.
I'M SORRY, JUAN DIEGO!! :'(
With no Celtics or musicians, I agree with everyone that this is one of toughest choices so far, between two equally impressive warriors for Christ. With all Douglass has going for him (which is a lot), I went with Diego, an indigenous convert from paganism who witnessed Christ's love to his people. (“Tlecuatlecupe” doesn't sound very similar to "Guadalupe" to me, but then I don't know how to pronounce Nahuatl.)
A tough choice...but I must vote for Juan Diego. What swayed me is the that Juan Diego lived a life of poverty, humility and servanthood.
I am honoring my Spanish California ancestors by voting for Juan Diego.
I just don't see a Golden Halo in either one's future but gave my vote to the current underdog.