Emma of Hawaii vs. Paul of Tarsus

In the final battle of the Round of the Saintly Sixteen, Emma of Hawaii takes on Paul of Tarsus. The winner heads to the Elate Eight to square off against Thomas Cranmer. Two primary questions will be decided in the next 24 hours: 1) Will the Bishop of Hawaii once again be able to get out the vote for Queen Emma like a pointy-hatted precinct captain? 2) Will Romans 8 swing the tide toward Paul despite all those run-on sentences that are the bane of lectors throughout all of Christendom?

This past weekend we saw how have the legions (and by that word we mean lots of people not the uber-demon in Mark 5:9) of Lent Madness fans coped with another bout of LMW (Lent Madness Withdrawal): they read about Lent Madness in Sports Illustrated and watched fans on video answer the question "What do you love about Lent Madness?" The Supreme Executive Committee does what it can to ease your pain.

Following the climactic match-up of this round (made up of saintly Quirks & Quotes), only eight saints will remain standing. We'll kick things off on Tuesday morning with Mary Magdalene taking on Evelyn Underhill. Then we'll proceed with Dietrich Bonhoeffer vs. Jerome followed by Margaret of Scotland vs. Enmegahbowh and Thomas Cranmer vs. the winner of today's match-up. The "madness" never ends! Well at least for a bit longer. Check out the updated bracket and prepare yourselves mentally and physically for the crescendo of the saintly smackdown.

When Emma of Hawaii was born in Honolulu in 1836, the young chiefess was offered for adoption to her mother's sister, Grace Kamaikui Rooke, and her husband, an English court physician. This followed the Hawaiian custom of hanai, whereby a child would be given to grandparents to raise or to a couple who, like the Rookes, were unable to have children. In old Hawaii there was no such thing as an unwanted child. Children were told they were “bowls of light put here to shine great spirit greatness." In the Rooke household, Emma was taught to be very British while her hanai mother, Grace, raised her to be Hawaiian as well.

Shortly after her marriage to Alexander Liholiho, King Kamehameha IV, in 1856, the new queen became involved in life of the kingdom. Her deepest concern was saving the Hawaiian people from extinction. In fewer than 80 years, the Hawaiian population plummeted from 350,000 to 70,000 due to disease introduced by Europeans. The threat of extinction was a very real. In his first speech as monarch, Kamehameha proposed the building of a hospital and the young couple quickly worked to solicit funds to establish one. To honor her dedication to the effort, the hospital, named Queen’s Hospital, opened in 1859. It is said that Emma visited patients at the hospital every day that she was in Honolulu, a practice that gained her the great love of her people.

In addition to their concern for the physical well-being of the Hawaiian people, Queen Emma and the king took steps to ensure their spiritual well-being, with the first services in the new Anglican church formed by the Church of England at their behest held on October 12, 1862. The king and queen were baptized on October 21 and confirmed in November. They felt the Anglican church was “eminently suited to the character and temperament of his people,” according to the website of St. Andrew’s Cathedral.

However, the couple’s happiness at the establishment of the Church of Hawaii was clearly diminished by the tragic death of their four-year old son just six weeks prior the Pro-Cathedral’s consecration. More tragedy followed when King Kamehameha died 15 months later at age 29.

According to the website of St. Andrew’s Cathedral:

“To ease her pain, Emma dedicated herself to many worthy causes, among which was organizing a hospital auxiliary of women to help with the ill. She also helped found two schools, St. Andrews Priory in Honolulu and St. Cross on Maui. Her work included the development of St. Andrews Cathedral. She journeyed to England where she and her friend, Queen Victoria, raised $30,000 for the construction of the cathedral. The first phase of the cathedral was completed in time for Christmas, 1886, due in great part to the support for the Queen’s vision of the Cathedral as a memorial to her husband. Queen Emma did not live to worship in the Cathedral.  She had died the previous year on St. Mark’s Day 1885.”

Queen Emma’s biographer, George S. Kanahele, has this to say:

"She was different from any of her contemporaries. Emma is Emma is Emma. There’s no one like her. A devout Christian who chose to be baptized in the Anglican church in adulthood, and a typically Victorian woman who wore widow’s weeds, gardened, drank tea, patronized charities and gave dinner parties, she yet remained quintessentially Hawaiian. She wrote exquisite chants of lament in Hawaiian, craved Hawaiian food when she was away from it, loved to fish, hike, ride and camp out (activities she kept up to the end of her life) and, throughout her life, took very seriously her role as a protector of the people’s welfare. In a way, she was a harbinger of things to come in terms of Hawaii’s multi-ethnic, multi-cultural society. You have to be impressed with her eclecticism — spiritually, emotionally and physically. She was kind of our first renaissance queen.”

-- Heidi Shott

 Known more for his missionary travels and fierce dedication to the mission of Christ, it may come as a surprise that Paul of Tarsus (5-67) is arguably the best-selling author of all time.  Sure Plato, Shakespeare, and even J.K. Rowling have their fans, but this devout Jew, thrown from his horse then given a vision of Jesus so real that he dedicated his life to talking about it, did so with such appeal that even today, the Bible remains the world’s best selling book.

Paul is responsible for about two-thirds of the New Testament. His greatest hits are more memorable than Agatha Christie’s and more numerous than The Rolling Stones’. They include the Book of Romans, especially chapter 8, “[nothing]… will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord,” 1 Corinthians 13, “Love is patient, love is kind…” and Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians, “And whatever you do, in word or deed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus…” (Col. 3).

Paul’s quirks are generally known and roundly contested. They include his partiality to the single life and his ‘thorn in the flesh’ (an eye infection or a burdensome companion). Paul condoned slavery, treated women as second-class citizens, and was prone to rather heated arguments. Yet his compulsion to document his Christian journey and theological convictions would overshadow his most distracting paroxysm.

While much of his writing was done in less than perfect conditions (jail), under less than perfect deadline pressure (death), and with less than perfect remuneration (persecution), his deep-seated conviction, that life in Christ was an all or nothing affair, pierced every text: “For me living is Christ and dying is gain.” (Phil 1).

Paul’s motivation was passion. His reward was martyrdom. His legacy, to every writer everywhere, is to write with conviction. Paul empowers authors to believe that their greatest work is to channel that which is deep within them, to affect a world far beyond them, through a presence mostly unknown to them. Here’s to a guy who did all sorts of amazing stuff, still found time to write about it, and never made a nickel.

-- Chris Yaw

 

Vote!

[poll id="27"]

Subscribe

* indicates required

Recent Posts

Archive

Archive

101 comments on “Emma of Hawaii vs. Paul of Tarsus”

  1. The decisions are getting harder. However, there's no reason to cast aspersions (or, as my sister says, "asparagus") on people who don't vote for your favorite. We all have our reasons and all reasons are valid. Don't spoil the fun by getting super critical of others' choices. As someone said, "These saints already have crowns, " and they won't get bigger ones just because we mere mortals are voting to move them forward towards the Golden Halo.

  2. This is SERIOUS business here, for us to decide which saint deserves the Golden Halo. I'm certain there are many souls in heaven holding their breaths to see if little Queen Emma will be able to continue on the road to obtain the Golden Halo. Go Emma, we love you. h+++

  3. This has turned into a delightful Lenten discipline for me -- SERIOUS practice in LIGHTENING UP -- reminiscent of the year that, inspired by Luke Johnson's New Testament lecture on Galatians, I gave up virtue for Lent. May the Madness reign!

  4. I hope all you Emmanites 😉 come to her side against Cranmer! As the brackets narrow down, the rationales become more interesting.

    I keep submitting, but no tote bag! What gives?

  5. An extension of Shrove pancakes and Mardi Gras king cake into all of Lent! Madness is delightful! And, I voted for Paul along with Joan! HA! Have Fun!!!

  6. Such a dilemma! LM's not like in basketball where one chooses one team over another! Voting for one saint over another is just awful ! We're all on the SAME team!
    Voting for Paul, the law giver. (Though I'd rather spend time with Emma building schools, etc.)

  7. It's all a celestial crap shoot in the end! I've had about as much luck with my candidates for the golden halo as I've had with the last few elections...That'swhy I'm also running my own bracket on the side where the only opinion that counts is mine! mine! mine! yes, I am meek and humble of heart 🙂

  8. I voted for Emma, though I thought long and hard about it. I'm actually a fan for Paul. I grew up in a Pentecostal tradition, one that began ordaining women before 1920, I might add, a little gay boy. We were in church whenever the doors were open, which was quite often. I learned to understand complex sentences reading Paul and, much more importantly, I learned grace. So, my vote wasn't anti-Paul. Instead, I voted for Emma because she, as I read her story, lived out the Christian call that Paul describes. I'd vote for both of them if I could, but as much as Paul influenced me, I think he influenced Emma more. If the vote were for "who has had the greater importance in the church", I'd go for Paul. But that's not how I'm approaching Lent Madness (nor how I approached it in previous year). I read the biographies, learn something often, and vote for the person whose story most touched me that day.

  9. My vote went to Paul today. I voted for him in part because I'm against any
    one dioceses voting in a block group not because the saint represents idea or
    some ideal but because the saint lived in a certain country or part of the world. Or because one bishop would like to have the saint who lived in his diocese get the Golden Halo

  10. I've done some reading of my own on Emma in hopes of writing a curriculum on her. If my memory serves me right, she was a sore loser and would not socialize with relatives at family gatherings after she lost the election to David Kalakua. I enjoyed reading the above information about her, which gives me inspiration to return to my project. Now I have a more positive viewpoint about her work!!

    1. Well, don't judge her too harshly -- a lot of people don't socialize with relatives or even go to family gatherings for seemingly lesser reasons.

  11. It was not a legal election. They overthrew Emma, as the men of the government did not want a sole female leader. She was treated in a cruel and humiliating way. She was the Queen of the people, not the pick by male politicians. Queen Emma was ahead of her time.

  12. Voting for our wonderful Queen Emma. She did so much for the people of Hawaii and left such a legacy for generations to come. Her contributions continue to generate hope for the future of our Hawaiian islands and help those in need.
    Kauai, HI